democratic consolidation in Nigeria's Fourth Republic. Despite the constitutional recognition of local governments as the third tier of administration, their functional
and financial independence remains a subject of intensive debate. The central problem
addressed is the persistent interference by state governments through the State Joint Local
Government Account (SJLGA) and the appointment of caretaker committees, which
undermine the democratic essence of local governance. Utilising a qualitative research
methodology, the study relies on secondary data sources, including academic journals,
constitutional provisions and official reports. The theoretical framework is grounded in the
Decentralization Theory, which posits that bringing government closer to the people enhances
accountability and political participation. Findings reveal that local government autonomy in
Nigeria is more of a myth than a reality, stifled by ''political capture'' and constitutional
ambiguities. Findings from the study shows that without a distinct separation of powers
between the state and local levels, democratic consolidation-characterised by stable,
transparent and participatory governance-remains elusive. Consequently, the study concludes
that local government autonomy is a prerequisite for deepening democracy. It recommends a
comprehensive constitutional amendment to abolish the State Joint Local Government
Account (SJLGA), the empowerment of the Independent National Electoral Commission
(INEC) to conduct local polls, and the enforcement of direct funding to local councils to
ensure that they serve as effective catalysts for grassroots development and democratic
stability.
| DOWNLOAD COMPLETE ARTICLE HERE (CLICK) |